王竹立老师今天发表了自己思考ChatGPT在学校教育中应用的话题，用诗歌的形式发表了自己的深度思考：

学校到底应不应该禁用ChatGPT?

这个问题已摆在学校和老师的面前，

多数教育技术学者不主张禁止使用，

但也有不少国家和地区已开始禁用，

看来人类对这个问题仍处在探索中。

上次我们面对的同一种性质的问题，

还是学校应不应该禁止带智能手机，

这个问题至今仍属于各方意见不一，

有人反对也有人支持各有各的道理。

最后在现实中形成某种微妙的平衡，

大学普遍都不禁止中小学普遍禁止，

管理部门要求禁止师生想办法变通，

疫情期间原来的禁令更是形同虚设。

估计对ChatGPT结果也会非常相似，

有人禁有人不禁或有时禁有时不禁，

人类在纠结中还是会摸着石子过河，

教育在这个过程中慢慢适应新情境。

我个人的意见是原则上不应该禁用，

反而应鼓励大家多使用这类新技术，

但必要的时候比如考试时可以禁用，

因为那时考核的是个人而不是机器。

这就好比我们多了一个聪明的伙伴，

有时是老师有时是助手有时是同事，

我们为什么不与她交往并从中受益，

但也不能完全依赖而放弃自己努力。

随时随地带上她一道学习工作思考，

与她互相取长补短共同提高和进步，

但作决策和判断时还需要依靠自己，

她不是你你不是她决不能丧失自我。

资料来源：王竹立微信号，2023-04-30 00:03 发表于广东

https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/rr1tn5uj9FNN_lxnNBMXjg

我问，请ChatGPT对这首诗歌的原作进行评价：

ChatGPT的回复：

作为一首绕口令自由体诗歌，这首诗歌非常有趣、有创意，同时还很有挑战性。作者巧妙地运用了大量的押韵、内韵、头韵、口韵等技巧，使得整首诗歌充满了节奏感和美感。同时，作者还将一个非常有争议的话题巧妙地融入了诗歌中，让读者在欣赏诗歌的同时，也可以思考这个问题。整体而言，这首诗歌兼具艺术性和思想性，值得读者深入阅读和品味。

我问，请ChatGPT编写上面的诗歌的内容摘要：

ChatGPT的回复：

这首绕口令自由体诗歌题目为《学校应该不应该禁止不禁止还是又禁止又不禁止ChatGPT？》，主要围绕学校是否应该禁用人工智能助手ChatGPT展开，通过对这个问题的分析，表达出个人的看法和建议。诗歌内容包括：问题的摆在面前，学者和国家地区的不同态度，对比手机禁令和大学与中小学的不同，估计未来的情况，个人建议与理由，以及对人工智能的好处和缺点的讨论。

我问，请ChatGPT把这首诗歌改编成学术论文，1000字：

ChatGPT的回复：

Title: Should schools ban or allow the use of ChatGPT?

Abstract: With the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the use of AI-assisted tools such as ChatGPT in education has become a hotly debated issue. While some educators argue for its benefits, others believe that it may hinder students' development. This paper aims to explore the question of whether schools should ban or allow the use of ChatGPT by examining the arguments from both sides, analyzing the current situation, and providing recommendations for future practice. The findings suggest that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for enhancing students' learning outcomes, but its use should be carefully monitored to ensure that it does not replace students' independent thinking and creativity.

Introduction: Artificial intelligence has been increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives, including education. ChatGPT is an AI-based language model that can generate human-like responses to a given text prompt. This tool has been used in education to assist students in writing, reading comprehension, and other tasks. However, the use of ChatGPT in education has sparked a debate about whether schools should ban or allow its use. This paper aims to explore this issue by examining the arguments from both sides, analyzing the current situation, and providing recommendations for future practice.

Arguments for banning ChatGPT in schools: One argument for banning ChatGPT is that it may hinder students' development of critical thinking and creativity. Some educators believe that relying too heavily on AI tools may reduce students' motivation to think independently and creatively. Moreover, ChatGPT may not always provide accurate or reliable responses, which may further undermine students' learning outcomes. Another argument is that ChatGPT may be used for cheating during exams or assignments, as students can input questions and receive answers without actively engaging in the learning process.

Arguments for allowing ChatGPT in schools: On the other hand, many educators argue that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for enhancing students' learning outcomes. For example, ChatGPT can provide students with immediate feedback on their writing, which can help them improve their writing skills. Additionally, ChatGPT can assist students in reading comprehension by providing them with definitions or explanations of difficult words or concepts. Finally, ChatGPT can be used to support students with learning disabilities, as it can provide personalized assistance and adapt to their specific needs.

Current situation and future recommendations: Currently, the use of ChatGPT in education varies among schools and regions. Some schools have banned its use, while others have embraced it as a valuable tool for learning. In the future, it is recommended that schools adopt a balanced approach to the use of ChatGPT. Schools should provide clear guidelines on when and how ChatGPT can be used, and ensure that its use is carefully monitored to prevent cheating and encourage students' independent thinking and creativity. Moreover, educators should receive adequate training on how to use ChatGPT effectively and integrate it into their teaching practice.

Conclusion: The debate over whether schools should ban or allow the use of ChatGPT is complex and multifaceted. While there are valid concerns about its potential negative impacts, there are also many benefits to using ChatGPT in education. Therefore, it is recommended that schools adopt a balanced approach that takes into account the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, and provides clear guidelines and monitoring mechanisms to ensure its appropriate use. With careful planning and implementation, ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for enhancing students' learning outcomes and preparing them for the future.

  

我说，请ChatGPT翻译成中文版：

ChatGPT的回复：

题目：学校应不应该禁用ChatGPT？

这个问题已经摆在学校和教师们的面前，许多教育技术学者不赞成禁用，但也有很多国家和地区已经开始禁用，看来人类对这个问题仍在探索中。

我们曾经面对过类似的问题，即学校是否应该禁止带智能手机，这个问题至今仍存在各方意见不一的局面，有人反对也有人支持，各有各的道理。

最后，在现实中形成了某种微妙的平衡，大学普遍不禁止使用，但中小学普遍禁止，管理部门要求禁止时，师生们会想办法变通，而在疫情期间，原来的禁令更是形同虚设。

预计对于ChatGPT，结果也会非常相似，有人禁用，有人不禁用，或者有时禁用，有时不禁用，人类仍在摸着石头过河，教育系统在这个过程中逐渐适应新的情境。

笔者个人认为，原则上不应该禁用，反而应该鼓励大家多使用这类新技术。然而，在必要的时候，如考试时，可以禁用，因为那时考核的是个人而不是机器。

这就像我们多了一个聪明的伙伴，有时是老师，有时是助手，有时是同事。为什么不与它交往并从中受益呢？但是，我们也不能完全依赖它而放弃自己的努力。

我们随时随地带着它一起学习、工作和思考，与它互相取长补短，共同提高和进步。但是，在做出决策和判断时，我们仍需要依靠自己，因为它不是你，你也不是它，绝不能失去自我。

来源：王竹立微信公众号，2023年4月30日，广东发布。

欢迎读者一起来思考和讨论：学校到底应不应该禁用ChatGPT?