Stellaris开发日志#255 | 5/26 四海皆臣你问我答（第一部分）

牧游社 牧有汉化翻译

Stellaris Dev Diary #255 - Overlord Q&A (Part-1)

Eladrin, Stellaris Game Director

Hi!

大家吼啊！

This week is a short one in Sweden due to holidays, so instead of a normal dev diary we've got a transcript of the Stellaris Q&A session we held on the Official Stellaris Discord Server on May 5th.

因为有假期，瑞典的这一周工作日比较少，所以我们这次没有做平常的开发日志，而是搞了一个5月5号在Stellaris官方Discord服务器上的问答环节的文稿。

We answered the following 108 questions:

我们回答了下列108个问题：

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS!

你问我答！

Question by Belauem

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q：This question is about the new mercenary enclave. If you create one how are its admirals treated? Do you get some for the rented fleets and if so does it eternaly keep your original admiral or will a new one be created out of your species when the old one dies and do traits like psionic etc are applied afterwards to them if your species gains them?

问：我想问一下新的佣兵城邦的事。如果你创建了一个佣兵城邦，那么他的舰队统帅会怎么样？舰队租借出去之后你能不能拿到一点好处？如果是的话，城邦是会永久保存你的原始统帅，还是会在老的那个去世之后，按照你的物种创建一个新的出来？如果我的物种之后有了灵能之类的的特质，能否对城邦里的统帅生效？

A：The admiral that was the leader of the fleet when you released it will become the "ruler" of the Mercenary Enclave. They should hire admirals of their species to lead the fleet.

答：释放舰队成为城邦的时候，作为舰队领袖的统帅会成为佣兵城邦的“统治者”。他们会雇佣本物种的统帅来领导他们的舰队。

Question by Jeff, GigaCorp™ CEO

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Is their any chance of getting a farming designation for habitat? It;s a fairly common scifi trope, so I;m kinda surprised it isn;t a thing yet.

问：能否给居住站加一个农业规划类型？在科幻设定中这还是挺常见的，我有点奇怪为什么游戏里还没有这个。

A：I was discussing hydroponic habitat designations with Offe the other day regarding automation improvements.

答：我前两天还在和Offe讨论水培农场居住站规划类型的自动化改进的事情。

Question by Cape/008/GBSC (DO NOT PING)

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:Will we be able to make mercenary fleets out of the swarms from the Prethoryn Brood Queen relic?

问：用索林原虫虫后遗珍拿到的舰队能否用来创建佣兵城邦？

A:I haven't personally tried it, but it should work as long as you have a fleet of size 50 or larger and an admiral in charge of it.

答：我还没有亲自试过这个，不过只要你有规模50以上的舰队，还有舰队统帅的话应该就可以创建佣兵城邦。

Question by not dead ;)

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:how tall are the foxes compared to the humans

问：小狐狸和人比起来有多高呢？

A:Shorter, ears and all!

答：要矮一点嘛，毕竟有兽耳。

Question by QuicksilverDragon

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:how does AI choose which vassal type to be in Imperial Fiefdom

在帝国封邑起源中，AI是怎么选择附庸种类的？

A:Only player empires get to pick a specialism for the origin.

答：只有玩家帝国才可以在用这个起源的时候选一个专精方向。

Question by Money LLC CEOverlord

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:any plans to rework branch offices, especially regarding having more than one corp per planet?

问：有没有计划重做子公司？比如能让一个行星上有不止一个子公司？

A:We don't have any current plans to rework branch offices, but it'd be interesting to explore some sort of competition mechanics.

答：目前我们没有重做子公司的计划，但是探索一下某种竞争机制应该会很有趣。

Question by MathyM

Answered by GruntsPlayground

Q:Are we able to influence how Mercenary ships are designed, so they synergize with our preferred weapon choices? Do they take up our navy cap once hired?

问：我们能否影响佣兵舰船的设计，好让他们和我偏好的武器进行协同？雇佣他们之后，他们是否会占用我的海军容量？

A:They are not designable, though you can share your tech with them. Once you hire them, they will use up your Naval Capacity.

答：他们的舰船不能设计，不过你可以把科技分享给他们。一旦你雇佣了他们，他们就会消耗你的舰队容量。

Question by Muhrks

Answered by MrFreake (Stellaris CA)

Q:Could you provide a complete list (with links) of the streamers in the upcoming weekend event? Also: Are all streams in english?

问：能否给我们提供一个会参与接下来的周末活动的完整主播名单（以及链接）？另：这些直播都是英语的吗？（译注：欢迎关注小牧Phenix）

A:We'll be announcing the full lineup tomorrow

答：明天我们会公布完整的阵容。

Question by Crazy Mordrid the Xeno-Compat

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:Bubbles Plushie when

问：泡泡玩偶能不能搞快点

A:I think I can safely say if it was up to the devs in this QA session, this wouldn't even be a question.

答：我可以很肯定地说，如果参与问答的开发者能定下来这事，这早就不成问题了。

Question by Seraph

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:Dev diary states: "Hyper Relays can be built in your own space, or that of your subjects." Can subject build hyper relay in his overlord's space? As a scholarium i should have access to hyper relays tech much faster than my overlord and both networks are needed to utilize it's full potential.

问：引用开发日志：“超空间中继器可以在你或你的附庸国境内建造。”附庸国能在他的宗主国境内建造超空间中继器吗？作为学邦，我应该能比我的宗主国能更早拿到超空间中继器的科技，为了达到最大效果，应该需要两边的超空间中继器网络吧。

A:Currently subjects cannot build relays in their overlord's space.

答：目前附庸国不能在宗主国境内建造中继器。

Question by Epsylon-02Y Lakdav-built

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Regarding origins, what factors are being considered when coming up with the limitations on what kind of empire can or cannot take them? Asking for a machine friend.

问：对于起源来说，在决定什么样的国家能用或者不能用某些起源的限制时考虑了哪些因素？我替我的智械朋友问的。

A:I'd say the first thing we want to try and keep in mind is the narrative of the origin. If there's an obvious theme to the origin, we will limit it thereafter (e.g a pacifist origin probably couldn't be taken by militarists). Besides that, we want to try and appease most playstyles, and give everyone some toys to play with.

答：我会说我们一直放在心上的事情是起源的叙事。如果起源有一个明显的主题，我们就会在那之后做出限制（比如军国主义国家就没法用一个和平主义起源）。除此之外，我们还会试图迎合大部分游玩风格，让每个人都能拿到点东西玩玩。

Question by Jeff, GigaCorp™ CEO

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Is there any chance of a subsidiary type subject type, or is that vanishing forever with overlord.

问：子公司类型的附庸国还在吗，还是说四海皆臣出了之后这个就没有了。

A:The subsidiary subject type (added in MegaCorp) is still present in Overlord

答：四海皆臣中子公司类型的附庸国（在寰宇企业中加入）还是有的。

Question by Cape/008/GBSC (DO NOT PING)

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Is there any way we can gain singular pops from vassals without integrating them? I'm planning on playing a RS that aims to collect pops from every major species in the galaxy so this would be really helpful.

问：我们能否在不整合附庸的情况下拿到单个的附庸人口？我计划玩一个志在收集银河里每个主要物种的人口的失控机仆，能告诉我的话就太好了。

A:There may be a holding that does this...

答：或许我们可以搞一个这样的地产……

Question by Ben the Fox

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:This might be a silly question, but after watching the Overlord release date reveal trailer, I feel like I was left on a bit of a cliff hanger, do the foxes eventually free themselves from the evil humans (and potentially the robots too) and get a happy ending?

问：这问题或许挺傻的，但是看了四海皆臣发售日揭晓预告片之后，我觉得我好像特别关注这个悬念，小狐狸们最终逃出了邪恶人类（也许还有机器人）的魔爪重获自由，幸福快乐地生活下去了吗？

A:Depends on how the battle goes, doesn't it?

答：这个就得看仗打得如何了是吧？

Question by shadoWarbird

Answered by CheerfulGoth (Content Design)

Q:Hello, I'm super excited about the Overlord expansion, it looks really great! Speaking of expansions, I was wondering if the custodians have any motivations, goals or plans they would like to share in regards to improving older expansions? I think the way Species Packs was handled was absolutely amazing and I would love to see older expansions generating the same kind of hype that Utopia and Overlord have/has generated.

问：四海皆臣扩展包这事搞的我老激动了，看着真的不错！说到扩展包，我正在想守护者团队在改进老的扩展包上是否有什么动机，目标，或者计划？我觉得对于物种包的处理方式非常不错，我十分期待一些老的扩展包能达到乌托邦或者四海皆臣的高度。

A:I can't speak for the whole team, but personally I would LOVE to just reread all old content and add new event options here and there, where it makes sense - a task other content designers already started! Stuff like adding more special options to robot-related events if you play machine empires, extra interactions you meet plant aliens as a plantoid, etc. Adding extra civics/features to old DLCs can be great, but I believe small surprises can make old content feel fresher as well.

答：我没法代表整个团队发言，但是我个人非常喜欢重读一遍老的内容，四处加一点说的通的事件选项——其他内容设计者已经开始做这件事了！比如你扮演智械国家时，给机器人相关的事件增加更多的特殊选项，作为植物类时遇到植物外星人时的额外互动，等等。给老的DLC增加新的理念/特性很不错，但是我觉得这种小惊喜也能让老内容焕发新活力。

Question by amphibia ended

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:have you considered making a species pack of purely alien creatures, such as energy beings or Lovecraftian abominations?

问：有没有考虑过做一些完全不现实的生物，比如纯能量生命体或者洛夫克拉夫特式怪物？

A:The art team considers many things we as levitate above the ground using the power of our minds during our daily meditation sessions. Stay tuned!

答：美术团队在每天的冥想活动中运用灵能浮空时会考虑许多东西。保持关注！

Question by MathyM

Answered by Rose (Expansion Programmer)

Q:Will Subsidiaries be completely merged with the new Vassal system? In other words, will Megacorporations finally be allowed to integrate their vassals?

问：子公司是否会与新的附庸系统合并？换句话说，最后能允许大公司整合其子公司吗？A:Subsidiaries will be part of the new vassal system, but cannot be integrated (the term is locked for that vassal type)

答：子公司将成为新的附庸系统的一部分，但不能被整合（附庸类型会被锁定）。

Question by RedOwl

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Any chances we might see more types of special vassals eg for the Scion origin and have an incentive to bring others into the fold besides rp?

问：我们有没有可能看到更多先辈子弟那样的专精属国类型？另外，能不能给玩家一些角色扮演以外的，把AI打成狗的动机？

A:We would like to take a look at more specialists in general. As was mentioned by our Game Director in a recent interview, several specialist subject empires were left on the cutting floor throughout Overlord's development, and there's plenty of room to give them a second go. As for Scion in particular? We don't have anything particular in mind as far as I know.

答：我们想尝试更多的专精属国的情况。正如我们的游戏总监在最近的一次采访中提到的那样，在整个四海皆臣的开发过程中，有几个专精属国主题的帝国被删去了，而且现在有足够的空间给他们第二次机会。至于先辈子弟，据我所知没有什么特别想法。

Question by Siper

Answered by GruntsPlayground

Q:Any plans to rework hive civics? And make them match things such as technocracy, Like having "Expertise traits have double effects on tech choices".

问：有没有重做蜂巢思维民政的计划？让它们与技术治国等相匹配，比如让专长类特性对技术选择有双重影响。

A:Civic reworks and rebalancing, including hive civics will continue in future Custodian patches.

答：民政的重做和平衡，包括蜂巢思维民政的更新将包含在未来的守护者团队更新中。

Question by Amphithere Majesticon

Answered by CheerfulGoth (Content Design)

Q:Are there any mods that the Stellaris team play with often? Also great work on Overlord and good job Custodians for being awesome.

问：Stellaris团队经常玩哪些MOD？另外，四海皆臣和守护者们的工作做得很棒！

A:I barely have the time to play the base game and keep up with all the new content my colleagues are adding to the base game. I SEE the data on how many of you are playing the big Azur Lane mod, though, and I comment you for your tastes.

答：我几乎没有时间玩游戏本体，也没有时间跟上同事们添加到本体中的所有新内容。不过，我注意到不少人在玩碧蓝航线MOD。这是看在你的品味上做出的评论。

Question by MellowJacket

Answered by Rose (Expansion Programmer)

Q:Has the Scion Origin undergone any changes to account for the new vassal system? Similarly, have Fallen Empire vassals or Khanate Satrapies been integrated into the new vassal system?

问：先辈子弟起源有没有做出适应新的附庸系统的改变？还有，堕落帝国和掠夺者可汗有没有加入新的附庸系统？

A:They have been adapted to the new vassal system, but you can't negotiate your contract with FEs or the Khan

答：他们已经被纳入新的附庸系统，但你不能与堕落帝国或者大可汗谈判条款。

Question by un-vincible

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:I love branch offices being replaced with the more general "holdings" system! Do any of you have any other interesting ideas for ways the ability to have buildings on other empires' planets could be used? I'd love to see something like the establish embassy action actually placing an embassy building down, things like that

问：我喜欢用更通用的地产系统来取代公司分部！你们有什么关于在其他帝国的星球上拥有建筑的想法吗？我想看到类似于建立大使馆的操作实际上是建造作为大使馆的建筑的形式。

A:We've been discussed internally using the holdings system for more than Overlord-Subject interactions or Corporate stuff, such as diplomatic holdings (where embassies are the obvious choice), but don't have anything concrete planned yet.

答：我们已经在内部讨论过将地产系统用统治者与附庸或公司之间的互动，例如外交持有（比如大使馆），但目前还没有具体的计划。

Question by Zhainong

Answered by Monzun (Code Custodian)

Q:[Will there be a ground combat rework any time soon?]

问：[最近会重做地面战斗系统吗？］

A:There are no current plans for changing how ground combat works.

答：目前没有改变地面作战方式的计划。

Question by El Raymondo

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:I am very excited for the new possibility to plan out transport infrastructure, I think this is a really cool addition to the game. Any future plans on doing more structures like these, or expanding the new/existing mechanics, so that we can do a galactic equivalent of a "Cape to Cairo railway"?

问：我对规划交通基础设施的新可能性感到非常兴奋，我认为这是对游戏的一个非常酷的补充。未来是否有计划做更多类似的结构，或扩展新的/现有的机制，这样我们就可以建造一条银河系的“开罗-开普敦铁路”？

A:There have been many comparisons between Hyper Relays and space railroads. Just being a transportation system felt insufficient (especially after you got gateway technologies), which is why we added the ability to project effects through the network.

答：有很多人在比较超空间中继器和太空铁路的关系。这东西仅仅作为运输系统并不是终点（特别是在你得到星门技术之后），这就是为什么我们加强了通过这个网络投射特殊效果的能力。

Question by Azaken

Answered by CheerfulGoth (Content Design)

Q:What made you decide to focus on mobility in this update so much? I know how much iv wanted more mobility stuff since gateways unlock far too late I think and im aware others have wanted it as well, and we really needed more mid game and even some in the early/mid game, but im curious on what reasons you had to finally do it in this update?

问：是什么让你决定在这次更新中如此专注于机动性？我确实希望有更强的机动性，因为星门解锁的时间太晚了，我相信其他人也是如此。我们希望在游戏中期或是中前期有更强的机动能力。但我很好奇你最终在这次更新中这么做的原因是什么？

A:Some of us just really like trains, okay.

答：我们中的一些人真的非常喜欢火车，好吧。

Question by The Muted Man

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Have you ever thought about adding a FE hivemind?(praise iggy for the hivemind content and praise Beals for the amazing art)

问：你有没有想过增加拥有蜂巢思维的堕落帝国？（夸一夸iggy做的蜂巢思维的内容，也夸一夸Beals的惊人艺术力。）

A:I've not heard anyone talk about it. But it is a bit curious how certain elements of the game doesn't have any kinds of hiveminds, be that Enclaves, Fallen Empires, or Primitives. It's a pretty neat idea though, and it would make sense to consider it, if we ever took a second look at Fallen Empires down the line.

答：目前我还没听到过有人谈论过这个问题。但这有点奇怪，游戏的某些特定元素没有出现任何种类的蜂巢，无论是飞地、堕落帝国还是土著。不过这是个很好的想法，我们再考虑堕落帝国的时候会考虑这一点的。

Question by Hot Coffee

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:are we getting a new story pack at any point? I like anomalies

问：我们是否会有新的故事包？我喜欢异常现象

A:Likely! It's been a while since our last Story Pack.

答：很可能！距离我们上次的故事包已经有一段时间了。

Question by Zach856

Answered by Rose (Expansion Programmer)

Q:I want my hyper relay network station close to wormhole or star gate, can we integrate these structure together into one?

问：我希望我的超空间中继网络站靠近虫洞或星门，我们可以把这些巨型结构整合到一个里面吗？

A:You can't exactly merge them, but I like building my stargates right next to the hyper relays for extra-fast zooming around the map personally :) means the ships don't have to cross the system to get to them from the relay

答：你不能完全合并它们，但我个人喜欢把我的星门建在超空间中继站旁边，以便在地图上快速跳转：）这意味着飞船不必穿过星系就能从中继站到达星门。

Question by sobran

Answered by GruntsPlayground

Q:will there be big update for traits? Right now there are few meta traits which are clearly superior to all the others, and you if you pick anything else it hurts you hard. I know stellaris is hard on roleplay but majority options in trait department are strictly unfun and very underpowered to meta. We need rebalance and diversification in traits, can we expect it?

问：特质会有大的更新吗？现在，有几个明显优于其他所有特性的meta（套路最优解）特质，选择其他的就会造成问题。我知道Stellaris在角色扮演方面很难，但大多数特性选项都很无趣，对meta的支持也很不足。我们能期待特质系统的平衡和多样化吗？

A:Species Traits will be looked at in the future. We are well aware that they can get a bit stale.

答：我们将要关注物种特质。我们很清楚，它们可能略显陈旧。

Question by Saluki

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Might it ever be possible to play as a Fallen Empire? It would definitely be a different experience.

问：玩家是否有可能扮演堕落帝国？这绝对会是一种不同的体验。

A:I cannot imagine that ever to be the case. The Fallen Empires are incredibly particular in how they are created, and it would be impossible to make that be playable in a good way. Even if you tried to clone the looks of a Fallen Empire (both literally and how they act) onto a playable empire, I think we would have to change them so much that they wouldn't be like Fallen Empires anymore at the end of it.

答：我无法想象。堕落帝国的创建方式非常特别，而且不可能通过正常的方式使其拥有可玩性。即使把堕落帝国的外表（包括字面意思和行为方式）覆盖在可玩的帝国之上，我想我们也必须进行巨大的改变，以至于到最后也不再像堕落帝国了。

Question by Luke5Arman

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Being able to build gateways in subject territory is amazing! But if we can do that, could we also terraform subject planets into gaia worlds if we take the world shaper perk? I wanna grow a galactic garden of amazing planets, dang it!

问：可以在附庸的境内建造星门真是太吊了！既然我们都可以做到这些，那如果采用了星球塑形师飞升，能不能将附庸的星球改造成盖亚星球呢？草，我真的好想造一个满是高级星球的宇宙花园啊！

A:The Idyllic Bloom civic allows you to build Gaia-Seeder holdings on your subjects' planets to turn them into Gaia Worlds.

答：田园绽放理念可以让你在附庸的星球上建造盖亚播种器地产以此来改造成盖亚星球。

Question by Deer

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:Will machines ever get their own shipset? Besides them just using the shipset that their portrait most resembles, I think it would be interesting if they had their own. Robots would probably build differently than organics which would be an interesting thing to see.

问：智械种族会有他们自己的舰船外观吗？尽管现在使用的是和他们肖像相近的舰船外观，但我想如果能有专属舰船外观的话会很有趣。机器人的飞船外观设计应该会与有机生物不大一样，这肯定会是一个很有趣的事情。

A:I think everyone here can agree that we always want more, and as someone on the art team I think it's a great chance for some non-standard ship designs (we have definitely discussed the differences of machine built ships vs organically built ships). As always unless it's been specifically announced I can just give you a big nice non-committal 'stay tuned!...and a hug.

答：我想在座的每一个人都认同我们总是想要做的更多，同时作为美工团队的一份子，我觉得这是一个很好的机会去设计一些非默认舰船外观(我们已经很明确的讨论过智械与有机生物的舰船设计的不同之处)。像往常一样，除非有明确的公告，否则我们只能给你含糊的“敬请期待！”...以及一个大大的拥抱。

Question by Spatz

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:will overlords be able to sign commercial and research pacts with their vassals now? Previously they couldn't due to the vassal not being "an independent recipient"

问：现在宗主国可以与他们的附庸签订商业或是研究协议吗？这在以前是不可行的，因为附庸不是一个“独立的接受方”。

A:If the vassal doesn't have their diplomacy blocked by the vassal agreement, I believe they should be able to.

答：如果附庸没有被他们的附庸协议禁止外交的话，我想他们是可以签订协议的。

Question by Comrade of Xenonion News Union

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:when you put 'expansion prohibited' does it mean that the AI cannot colonise planets already in the space they own

问：当选择“禁止扩张”时是不是意味着AI也不会殖民已拥有星系中的星球呢？

A:No, Expansion Prohibited means that they cannot claim new systems, much like regular vassals in 3.3 and earlier.

答：不是的，禁止扩张意味着他们不再能宣称新的星系，这与3.3版本号以及更早版本的附庸有点类似。

Question by Saluki

Answered by MrFreake (Stellaris CA)

Q:What will the price of the DLC be?

问：新DLC的定价会如何呢？

A:Overlord will be USD 19.99/GBP 15.49/EUR 19.99 or regional equivalents.

答：四海皆臣的定价会是19.99美元/15.49英镑/19.99欧元或是当地同等水平。

Question by Azaken

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Will there be new options regarding the Overlord DLC for the Galactic Custodian/Imperial Core?

问：新的四海皆臣DLC会有星海监管人或者帝国核心的新内容吗？

A:Not specifically for the Galactic Custodian or Emperor, no.

答：没有专门为星海监管人与皇帝准备新内容。

Question by Iron Lotus

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:why can't we put all of our 3 points into one ethic or at least have just one ethic?

问：为什么我们不能将3个点数全用在一个思潮或者仅仅只选择一个思潮呢？

A:The Gestalt Consciousness ethic costs 3 points

答：格式塔意识花费3个点数

Question by Specknik - Reject Flesh

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:are you satisfied with the mechanist origin? sometimes i think that you should be able to customise your robots like in syncretic evolution.

问：你们对目前的机械师起源满意吗？有时候我觉得应该像协同进化起源一样可以自行设计机器人。

A:I'd like to give them another look, if I get the time to.

答：如果有时间的话我会考虑一下这个问题。

Question by Helicopter200

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:Will the "become the crisis" ships, and the aetherophasic engine ever get a unique model?

问：“化身天灾”所给的舰船以及以太相位引擎会拥有特殊模型吗？

A:This is a fascinating question because it brings up some of the points we are always having to consider. Some players might love that, others want to see their specific empire's ship set become the crisis ship set (Necroids and Imperials are already pretty menacing in my opinion). We would then also have to consider is it a single ship set, or a modification of every ship set currently in the game and an additional feature we would then have to account for in future ship sets. All I can say is that ship sets are quite expensive to make and that factors highly into what we are able to do.

答：这是一个有意思的问题，因为这个问题抓住了一些我们一直在思考的重点。有些玩家可能会喜欢这样，而有些玩家则希望看见自己帝国的舰船变成天灾专属外观（在我看来死灵以及帝国舰船已经是很有威胁性了）。我们还需要考虑是将这个作为单独的舰船外观，或是对当前游戏中所有的舰船外观进行修改，还是在未来的舰船外观设计中所需要考虑的额外内容。我所能说的是舰船外观设计是非常复杂的，这个因素很大程度上限制了我们的工作。

Question by Kiwibaum

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:Stephen Murray said in the interview with Aspec that he wished that all origins are more story focused rather than mechanically focused. I think origins that don't have a very set story allow you to be more creative with the story you come up with by yourself. Is the freedom for the player to write their own story a big concern when designing origins currently?

问：Stephen Murray在与Aspec的采访中曾提到他希望所有的起源都能更加注重故事情节而不是机制。我认为那些没有固定故事的起源能够给玩家更多的想象空间去发挥创造性。请问目前在设计起源时会不会考虑让玩家自由地去书写属于自己的故事呢？

A:Generally I'd like them to have at least some ongoing narrative focus alongside mechanical benefits. We usually attempt to give you enough freedom to interpret your story the way you want - leaving enough gaps that you can fill how you wish. (Example: Are the necrophages vampires? More like xenomorphs? What happens in those Ascension Chambers? We won't say, you decide that detail.)

答：通常情况下，我希望他们能够在注重机制增益的同时也关注叙事内容。我们通常会试着给予玩家足够的自由度让他们按照自己的想法来干预故事发展，留下足够的坑让玩家按自己所想去填。（举例：食尸文化的吸血鬼？或者说更像异形？升格之室里究竟发生了什么？我们不会明说，具体由你想象。）

Question by Azaken

Answered by Rose (Expansion Programmer)

Q:If an enemy takes control of a system, do they also take control of the Hyperlane? Also can Hyperlanes be used to help provide trade protection across systems, and also therefore prevent pirates from spawning in those systems? This is especially important for me to ask after having one game where despite everything a pirate enclave spawned in the same system four times, so I am determined to get whatever I can to stomp out those pirates!

问：如果敌人控制了一个星系，那他们同时也会控制该星系的超空间中继器吗？此外，超时空中继器可以为星系提供贸易保护吗？能防止海盗在这些星系生成吗？这些问题对我真的很重要，尤其是当我刚经历了海盗空间站连续四次出现在同一个星系的一局游戏之后，因此我决定尽全力铲除这些海盗！

A:To use a hyper relay, both ends need to be non-hostile, so yes, if you occupy both systems you can use their space highways. They don't help piracy suppression from starbases, but they do mean your patrolling fleet is faster! And personally, I can often go crush the pirates with my Home Fleet before they destroy my starbase thanks to the faster travel from Hyper Relays :)

答：如果想要使用超空间网络的话，双方都必须是非敌对状态。所以没错，当你占领两端的星系时，你可以使用它们的星际高速公路。尽管它们不能帮助恒星基地镇压海盗，但是这意味着你的巡逻舰队会更快地部署！而且就我个人而言，得益于超空间中继器提供的快速航行，我可以经常使用家园舰队在海盗摧毁我的恒星基地之前快速碾碎他们 :)

Question by Liggi

Answered by Monzun (Code Custodian)

Q:Would Stellaris ever consider expanding to include more "Characters"? Not talking Space CK, but all great sci-fi has important characters (Darth Vader, etc.)

问：Stellaris会考虑出一些额外的“角色”吗？我并不是说要变成CK太空版，但是那些著名的科幻小说都有一些重要角色。（比如达斯维达）

A:Yeah we think having some sort of characters would be cool! If we could find a way to fit them into the current sandbox nature of the game it's for sure something we would consider.

答：“没错，我们想添加一些角色应该会很不错！如果我们能找到合适的方法将它们放进当前的沙盒游戏环境中的话，我们肯定会考虑这些内容的。

Question by Cape/008/GBSC (DO NOT PING)

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:Without spoiling anything, will you judge people for getting the 'You Monster' achievement (the one with a sushi icon)? I feel like I know what it is and I don't like that.

问：在不剧透的情况下，你会批判那些取得“You Monster”成就的人吗（那个寿司图标的成就）？我想我知道那个成就是什么意思但是我不喜欢它。

A:You. Monster.

答：你这禽兽。

Question by Zach856

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Will the orbital ring be destroyed after the battle or will it be disabled like the star base. Can you make the orbital habitat and orbital ring can be attacked and bombarded by the fleet as well, can not be destroyed by the space fortress is seems strange.

问：想问下星环基地会在战斗后被摧毁还是会像恒星基地那么一样失效？你能不能让轨道居住站和星环基地也可以被舰队攻击和轰炸。无法被太空堡垒摧毁感觉有点怪。

A:Orbital rings are normally disabled and then control flipped when they are defeated as per normal starbases, but some factions (e.g. the Khan) can destroy them.

答：一般而言，星环基地在被打败后会像所有普通恒星基地一样失效然后转移其控制权，不过某些势力(比如大可汗)可以摧毁它们。

Question by Saluki

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Are we going to see more fallen empire content in future?

问：我们会在未来看到更多失落帝国的内容吗?

A:We have nothing planned right now, but I'd say there's a lot of room to do something more with them.

答：我们暂时没有任何计划，但我想说，我们有很大做关于他们的内容的空间。

Question by Ben the Fox

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:Why do spiritualists hate robots so much?

问：为什么唯心主义者对机器人恨之入骨？

A:They're coarse and rough and irritating and they get everywhere.

答：它们既粗鲁又粗糙，烦人而且无处不在。

Question by Sutopia

Answered by GruntsPlayground

Q:is there plan to allow picking the precursor at game start just like we can pick crisis?

问：有允许在开局时选择先驱者的计划吗，就像我们能选危机类型那样?

A:We are internally discussing the option but no promises for now

答：我们正在内部讨论相关选项，但暂时没有任何保证

Question by Deer

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Any plans for hive minds, specifically machines to be able to un-gestalt? Or the ability to make a non-gestalt machine empire?

问：有任何让蜂巢思维，特别是机械人可以非格式塔化的计划吗？或者制造一个非格式塔机械人帝国的能力？

A:A gestalt empire becoming a collection of individuals would be a very interesting story to explore, but there's no current plans for this.

答：探究格式塔帝国转变为个体集合的故事将会相当有趣，不过当前没有这方面的计划。

Question by Crazy Mordrid the Xeno-Compat

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:Are there any Mass Effect 2 references in Overlord, since you know...there is a DLC of the same name in that game

问：在Overlord里有任何的质量效应2梗吗，因为你懂的……后者里有一个同名的DLC。

A:Hyper Relays

答：超空间中继器（即答）。

Question by Artik

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q:Will we see new ship design in organic style for hivemind? and some origin or civic which allow build ships and buildings from food?

问：我们会不会看到新的有机蜂巢思维舰船外观和允许用食物建造船只和建筑的起源或国民理念呢?

A:I think that's a natural progression of any major hivemind expansion, and something I've at least discussed. Currently there is nothing that I can comment on, but some of what you asked is definitely easier to do than others if we do decide to go in that direction.

答：我想那是一个大型蜂巢思维拓展包里理所当然的拓展，也至少是我所讨论过的东西。当前我无可奉告，不过假如我们向这方面发展的话，你所问的一些东西一定会比其他的要来得易做。

Question by amphibia ended

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:are Primitives being considered as a theme for an upcoming DLC? They really need love (Primitive Hive Minds ftw)

问：土著是否会被考虑作为未来DLC的主题?他们真的很缺爱(土著蜂巢思维是最棒了)

A:We are aware that primitives are in need of some love, and that there is a lot we could do with them. But that is, sadly, the case for more elements in the game as well.

答：我们留意到土著们确实需要更多关照，而我们也可以为他们做很多很多内容。不过，很遗憾游戏里更多的其他要素也同样如此。

Question by MathyM

Answered by Monzun (Code Custodian)

Q:Are there any improvements to the UX planned? Specifically, new hotkeys being added to cycle between idle Science Ships and so on.

问：有任何改善UX（使用者体验）的打算吗?具体来说，加上在闲置科研船之间跳转的新热键之类的。

A:On the Custodian side, this is something we will always try to do in each patch and what you have there is a good suggestion, make sure to get it into the suggestions forum!

To answer your question more specifically, yes we have some plans that we are yet to reveal

答：从守护者团队方面来讲，这是一件我们在每个版本中总会尝试的事情，而你所提出的是一个好建议，记得把它提放上去建议论坛。

Question by Rynn Y11K

Answered by Beals (Concept Artist)

Q：Will the exhaust trail from starships ever be fixed to come out their actual engines?

问:星际舰船的轨迹会不会被修正成从真正的引擎中出来的样子?

A:If the trails aren't coming out of them how can you even be sure they're exhaust ports?

答:你怎么能确认没有产生航行轨迹的地方就是排气口呢?

Question by PAO | CrimsonBlade2

Answered by Alfray Stryke (Design)

Q:About habitats, can there be a way to put again them back to max buildings like it was before the rework that put them under 10? Without using void dweller, or the functional architecture civic, since some authorities like gestalt or megacorp can't use the civic, and not everyone is void dweller origin,// maybe one expand habitat decision that costs some influence and alloys to get one building slot until you get to the maximum of 16 slots like an arcology ( but that one gets it for free all at once) if you get the void dweller perk, would that be possible?

问：关于居住站，能不能以整个可以在它们里面建满建筑的方法，就像在把它们限在10个的那个重制之前一样? 因为部分政体如格式塔或是企业政府无法使用实用建筑的民政，而且并非人人都是虚空居者起源。总之，这俩加成不是人人都有。//假如你有太空子民飞升的话，可能来一个类似于理想城（不过那个一下子就全解锁了），花费影响力和合金扩建居住站以换取一个建筑糟的决议，直到到达上限16个为止，这样可行吗?

A:We want habitats to deliberately feel cramped, so we don't want you to be able to unlock too many building (or district) slots on habitats.

答：我们想让居住站有意地感到拥挤，故此我们并不想你能够解锁太多的居住站建筑（或是区划）槽。

Question by Periodotic

Answered by CheerfulGoth (Content Design)

Q:Do you ever plan on expanding on Machine empires? The experience has really been limited for them with less events, archeology sites, relics, diplomatic options, and whatnot. It’d be really interesting if you’d pay attention to it as much as hiveminds

问：你有没有打算过拓展一下机械帝国?它们的体验一直很有限，因为事件，考古遗迹，遗珍和外交选项之类的都比较少。如果你和蜂巢思维一样重视机械帝国的话一定会很有趣的

A:We're trying! Writing from the point of view of a gestalt intelligence is fascinating, but it's a content-intensive task and we don't always have the means to do it. Having said that... 01010100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100101 01110110 01100101 01101110 01110100 01110011 00100000 01100101 01111000 01100011 01101100 01110101 01110011 01101001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100101 00100000 01100101 01101101 01110000 01101001 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110111 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110100 01100011 01101000 00101110 00100000 01001000 01101111 01110010 01110010 01101001 01100010 01101100 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 01110011 00101110

答：在试了在试了!从格式塔意识的角度写作非常引人入胜，不过这是一项内容密集的工作，我们也并非总有这样做的方法。话虽如此……01010100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01100101 01110110 01100101 01101110 01110100 01110011 00100000 01100101 01111000 01100011 01101100 01110101 01110011 01101001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01101101 01100001 01100011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01100101 00100000 01100101 01101101 01110000 01101001 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110111 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110100 01100011 01101000 00101110 00100000 01001000 01101111 01110010 01110010 01101001 01100010 01101100 01100101 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 01110011 00101110（译注：以上数字经过二进制转换为ASCII码后得到句子There will be events exclusive to machine empires in this new patch. Horrible ones.，在新的线路中，将会有大量和机械帝国相关的事件，还是非常恶劣的那种）。

Question by transie

Answered by Eladrin (Game Director)

Q:how much bugfixing can we expect after the release of the patch before the team goes on summer vacation?

transie的问题

问：在开发团队放暑假前，我们能够预料多少在新版本发布后的bug维修呢?

A:We have plans for post launch support as needed for a few weeks after the release, and we have an entire team dedicated to fixing things.

答：我们有在新版本发布后几个星期里根据需要提供支持的计划，同时我们也有一整支专门修东西的团队。

Question by Ben the Fox

Answered by Snow Crystal

Q:Were there any inspirations for the progenitor hive origin, if any? P.S. I love the new hive origin by the way! ^w^

问：有没有任何始祖蜂巢起源的灵感来源呀，假如有的话? P.S. 顺带一提，我真的很喜欢新的蜂巢起源^w^

A:I am not Iggy, who sadly couldn't be here, so I am not going to say something specific was his inspiration. But I'd say that Hive Queens is a pretty well known stereotype.

答：我不是Iggy，很遗憾他无法来到这里，所以我也不会说什么具体东西是他的灵感来源。但是我想说蜂巢女王是个众所周知的刻板印象

##### To Be Continue #####

篇幅所限，问答后半部分请移步下篇：

翻译：AntiAccess Jepe 疯狂的新兵 视力不好的胡德 三等文官猹中堂 摸鱼怪 R·F

校对：一水战阿部熊 三等文官猹中堂

欢迎关注UP主和主播小牧Phenix！

欢迎关注牧游社微信公众号和知乎专栏！微信公众号改版为信息流，欢迎【置顶订阅】不迷路，即时获得推送消息！

B站在关注分组中设置为【特别关注】，将会在私信内及时收到视频和专栏投稿的推送！

欢迎加入牧有汉化， 致力于为玩家社群提供优质内容！组员急切募集中！测试群组822400145!  

本作品英文原文著作权属Paradox interactive AB所有，中文译文著作权属牧有汉化所有。