GPT-4告诉你：各分数段的一个典型雅思小作文长什么样

对于雅思写作的备考，了解自己当前的水平很重要。 以小作文，如果老师给你的打分是6分，那你一定很想知道对应的7分甚至8分主体段长什么样子。

让人类老师来做这个事情费时费力，会很辛苦，因为要按照你的原文的思想来改写的难度是不小的。

但是，如果让GPT-4来做，就是小菜一碟。

下面我下指令给GPT-4，让它以下面的图表题分别给出5，6，7和8分的小作文，并解释原因。

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

先是各分数段作文及英文解释：

各分数段作文：

**Band 5:**

1. The given table presents data about how consumers in five different countries spent their money on various items in the year 2002.

2. Overall, the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was in Turkey, while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum and minimum expenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy and Sweden, respectively.

3. In terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, Turkey spent the most with a percentage of 32.14%, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and lastly Italy, which spent only 16.36%.

4. When looking at clothing and footwear, Italy was the biggest spender with 9%, while the lowest was Sweden with 5.40%. For leisure and education, Turkey again spent the most at 4.35%, with Ireland spending the least at 2.21%.

**Band 6:**

1. The table provides a comparative view of consumer expenditure on various commodities in five distinct countries during 2002.

2. Overall, Turkey reported the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco, whereas Italy had the lowest. Conversely, Italy had the highest spending on clothing and footwear, while Sweden reported the lowest.

3. In more detail, Turkey led the pack with a hefty 32.14% of their spending directed towards food, drinks, and tobacco, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and finally Italy with a mere 16.36% expenditure on the same.

4. On the other hand, Italy emerged as the top spender on clothing and footwear with a 9% share, while Sweden lagged behind with a meagre 5.40%. As far as leisure and education are concerned, Turkey led with a 4.35% expenditure, with Ireland trailing at 2.21%.

**Band 7:**

1. The table elucidates the patterns of consumer expenditure on a trio of sectors across five diverse nations in 2002.

2. Overall, the bulk of spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was reported in Turkey, while Italy exhibited the lowest spending. In contrast, Italy topped the list for clothing and footwear expenditure, with Sweden at the bottom.

3. Diving deeper, Turkey allocated a substantial 32.14% of its total expenditure to food, drinks, and tobacco, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and Italy, which earmarked just 16.36% for these items.

4. Conversely, Italy devoted 9% of its spending to clothing and footwear, nearly twice the amount set aside by Sweden, which contributed a paltry 5.40%. With respect to leisure and education, Turkey again led the pack with a 4.35% expenditure, while Ireland spent the least at 2.21%.

**Band 8:**

1. The table furnishes an in-depth comparison of consumer spending habits across food, drinks, tobacco, clothing, footwear, and leisure and education in five different countries during the year 2002.

2. Overall, it is evident that Turkey demonstrated the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco, whereas Italy reported the minimum. On the contrary, Italy led in spending on clothing and footwear, with Sweden bringing up the rear.

3. A closer examination reveals that Turkey dedicated a significant 32.14% of their total spending to food, drinks, and tobacco, substantially more than Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and particularly Italy, which committed a minimal 16.36% to these commodities.

4. In a reversal of fortunes, Italy led the way in the clothing and footwear category with an expenditure of 9%, almost double that of Sweden, which allocated only 5.40%. The trend of spending on leisure and education was dominated by Turkey at 4.35%, nearly twice the amount invested by Ireland, the least spending country at 2.21%.

解释：

**Band 5:**

"The given table presents data about how consumers in five different countries spent their money on various items in the year 2002."

This introductory sentence is a simple paraphrase of the prompt, which is expected at this band level. However, it doesn't add any significant details or insights about the data.

"Overall, the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was in Turkey, while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum and minimum expenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy and Sweden, respectively."

The overview provides the main trends but is quite basic and doesn't highlight the key comparisons or anomalies.

In the following sentences, the candidate presents the data without any clear logical organization. The vocabulary ("highest", "lowest") and sentence structures are quite simple, and there are no complex sentences or advanced grammatical structures.

This response is a Band 5 because it meets the minimum requirements of the task: it presents the data and provides an overview. However, it doesn't showcase a wide range of vocabulary, complex sentences, or a high degree of coherence and cohesion.

**Band 6:**

The response at this band level begins to demonstrate a clearer structure and more detailed overview. The candidate uses more varied vocabulary (e.g., "reported", "expenditure") and more complex grammatical structures (e.g., "whereas"). The candidate also starts to make more detailed comparisons between the countries.

This response is a Band 6 because it goes beyond merely presenting the data and provides more detailed analysis. It shows a wider range of vocabulary and more complex sentences, though there might still be some grammatical errors.

**Band 7:**

At this band level, the candidate provides a comprehensive overview and detailed comparisons. The candidate uses advanced vocabulary (e.g., "allocated", "earmarked") and complex grammatical structures (e.g., "nearly twice the amount set aside by Sweden"). The response is well-organized, with clear transitions between ideas.

This response is a Band 7 because it fulfills all aspects of the task with few errors. It uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentences accurately, and it demonstrates a high level of coherence and cohesion.

**Band 8:**

At this band level, the candidate provides an in-depth analysis of the data. The candidate uses sophisticated vocabulary (e.g., "furnishes", "allocated", "demonstrated") and complex grammatical structures (e.g., "in a reversal of fortunes"). The response is highly coherent, with logical progression and clear transitions between ideas.

This response is a Band 8 because it excels in all aspects of the task. It uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentences accurately and appropriately, and it is highly coherent and cohesive.

中文版翻译和解释

这里给出中文版翻译和解释，方便同学们能更清楚和直观的了解各主要分数段的一个典型的雅思小作文长什么样和其中的差别：

**5分数段：**

"这个表格展示了2002年五个不同国家的消费者在不同项目上的消费情况。"

这个引言句子是对提示的简单释义，这在这个分数段是预期的。然而，它没有添加关于数据的任何重要细节或洞察。

"总的来说，土耳其在食物、饮料和烟草上的支出最高，而意大利的支出最低。相似地，衣物和鞋类的支出在意大利最高，而在瑞典最低。"

概述提供了主要的趋势，但是相当基础，没有突出关键的比较或异常。

在接下来的句子中，考生呈现数据，但没有任何明确的逻辑组织。词汇（"支出最多"，"支出最少"）和句子结构相当简单，没有复杂的句子或高级的语法结构。

这个回答是5分，因为它满足任务的最低要求：它呈现了数据并提供了概述。然而，它没有展示出广泛的词汇，复杂的句子，或高度的连贯性和粘连性。

**6分数段：**

这个分数段的回答开始展示出更清晰的结构和更详细的概述。考生使用更多变化的词汇（例如，"报告"，"支出"）和更复杂的语法结构（例如，"而"）。考生也开始做更详细的国家之间的比较。

这个回答是6分，因为它超越了仅仅呈现数据，并提供了更详细的分析。它显示了广泛的词汇和更复杂的句子，尽管可能仍然存在一些语法错误。

**7分数段：**

在这个分数段，考生提供了全面的概述和详细的比较。考生使用高级词汇（例如，"分配"，"指定"）和复杂的语法结构（例如，"几乎是瑞典的两倍"）。回答是有组织的，有清晰的思想转换。

这个回答是7分，因为它以很少的错误完成了任务的所有方面。它使用广泛的词汇和准确地使用复杂的句子，它展示了高度的连贯性和粘连性。

**8分数段：**

在这个分数段，考生提供了对数据的深入分析。考生使用复杂的词汇（例如，"提供"，"分配"，"展示"）和复杂的语法结构（例如，"在运气逆转中"）。回答高度连贯，有逻辑的进展和清晰的思想转换。

这个回答是8分，因为它在任务的所有方面都表现出色。它准确和适当地使用了广泛的词汇和复杂的句子，它是高度连贯和粘连的。

通过检查这些示例，中国的雅思考生可以理解不同分数段之间在质量和复杂性方面的区别。他们可以看到如何通过使用更高级的词汇，更复杂的句子，以及提供更详细和连贯的数据分析来提高他们的回答。

本文涉及的指令均收集于雅思终结者ChatGPT指令集。