千词演讲，向澳洲同学宣传福岛核废水的危害！
学校给了份作业，正中下怀：自由选题演讲，只要是最近一年新闻里有的都可以。
哎呀，作者君一寻思，那这个题目岂不是刚好？
于是就写了写，虽然字数没控制好超了，但这个第五版演讲稿也算可以见人了。
其实很想给你们看看作者君做的PPT，但是没办法，那个只能往读者群里分享了。
以下，其中中文版为谷歌翻译贡献。
[opens a 1.5L water bottle and take a sip] Do anyone know what this is?
Well, this is a bottle of radioactive water from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear pla —No, no, seriously, this is just a bottle of fresh water, from Woolworths. (Suddenly serious) 10 years later though, we might actually find bottled water radioactive, alongside everything else which also becomes radioactive. Those radioactive substances are from an accident long, long ago.
12 years ago, a tsunami near Fukushima cut the electricity used to pump cold water to cool the nuclear reactors in Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. This caused the fuel to overheat, melting through the container, and was exposed to the environment after explosions.[Images]
This exposure not only required water to cool the core down, but it also contaminates the ground water and rainwater which directly contacts the core. All that water contacted with core became radioactive. [video]As a response, Japanese government chose to filter the radioactive contents, then stored them in storage tanks. Six weeks ago, the Japanese authorities initiated the release of “treated water” , or 処理水(Shori si) in Japanese—(Looking at Luna（注：一名日裔同学）, in an overexaggerated “serious” tone) I warn you do not tell everyone if I spelled it wrong, or I will murder you!
According to Japanese government, the “treated water” is “safe under drink water standards” and is therefore “safe” to release into the ocean. However, the plan also attracted much controversy around the globe.
Now, if this bottle of water is actually filled with that “treated” water, would you take a drink? (Pause) I would not, which is why I think the radioactive water should not have been released into the ocean and should be stopped as soon as possible.
BP1- “treated water”?
To begin, I would like to inform everyone about the effects of radioactive waste. [image] It ejects neutrons out of it rapidly, all with the potential to break countless strands of DNA in countless cells, as neutrons will not stop after piercing one cell. Impacted cells may either unable to reproduce; or they become defective and so will the cells it reproduces; or they develop into cancers. To above reasons, radioactive waste severely threatens all organisms near it.
Now, let us have a look at water stored in Fukushima. That is water which directly contacted the exposed core, treated under ALPS, which stands for Advanced Liquid Processing System, but still contains some radioactive substances. Interestingly, radioactive waste is “a type of hazardous waste that contains radioactive material”, which matches radioactive water in Fukushima. Em…
Why do I have to clarify that? Because the name of a concept affects how we understand it. How would you feel about “treated water”? In my opinion it is close to industrial wastewater. Will “radioactive water” sound the same? No, they are radioactive wastes. Obviously, people will not regulate industrial wastewater as seriously as radioactive wastes, which is why now hundreds of tonnes of those wastes are flowing into the Pacific each day!
BP2-Wolf in sheep’s clothing
Although the Japanese government depicts that their “treated” water is safe, which the examination to “treated water samples” by “International Atomic Energy Agency”, or IAEA supports, the authority of those statements are weak, even if IAEA is the United Nation equivalent in nuclear field. Let us unwrap those statements “supported” by “science”. ALPS is a filter system developed by Japan used only in Fukushima, its effect is not yet verified globally; IAEA did examine water samples, but the samples are directly given by Japanese government. They can even offer IAEA the bottle of water in my hand right now(body language), and tell them, “Hey, this is the water sample from Fukushima” if Tokyo feels like it. Because of that, even the statement IAEA made also mentioned that it will not take any responsibilities. Now, based on those scientific nonsense, Japanese authorities say, “Our release is supported by science”, which, well… is biased.
BP3-Not “Them” but “Us”
What will happen to humanity when radioactive substances spread throughout the Pacific? One academic publication claimed the total global social welfare cost could exceed US$200 billion, but to be honest, we don’t know. As Japan acknowledges radioactive water as “treated water”, almost no research is conducted; we better not to take risks.
Although the radioactive water Japan releases will probably not going to directly kill, Japan acts very irresponsibly. Japan placed the whole world into a bet, betting that side effects for releasing nuclear wastes into the ocean will be negligible. Yet, If Japan lost the bet, everyone would face the consequences equally.
Possibly, in ten years, we will be able to enjoy a radioactive shower at home in Melbourne. By that point, not as much can be done.
Reflection
The famous physicist Albert Einstein once said, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” In fact, if the “treated water” is literally under “drink water standards”, there are no good rationales to release the water into the ocean; if it is not drinkable, then it is not as safe as Japan illustrates and should not be released either. Since Japan is a country lack of fresh water, I even have a solution to that “treated water” right here: desalinate the treated water, pack that water into this bottle (prop) and sell it as drink water.
The question comes back though——
Would you take a drink?
【谷歌生草器】
[打开1.5L水瓶喝一口]有人知道这是什么吗？
嗯，这是一瓶来自福岛第一核电站的放射性——不，不，说真的，这只是一瓶来自 Woolworths 的淡水。 （突然严肃起来）十年后，我们实际上可能会发现瓶装水具有放射性，其他所有东西也具有放射性。 这些放射性物质是很久很久以前的一次事故造成的。
12 年前，福岛附近的海啸切断了福岛第一核电站用于泵送冷水以冷却核反应堆的电力。 这导致燃料过热，通过容器熔化，并在爆炸后暴露在环境中。[图片]
这种暴露不仅需要水来冷却核心，而且还污染了直接接触核心的地下水和雨水。 所有与核心接触的水都具有放射性。 [视频]作为回应，日本政府选择过滤放射性物质，然后将其储存在储罐中。 六周前，日本当局开始释放“处理过的水”，或者日语中的“处理水（Shori si）”——（看着Luna（注：一名日裔同学），语气过于夸张“严肃”）我警告 如果我拼错了，你不要告诉所有人，否则我会杀了你！
日本政府表示，“经过处理的水”“符合饮用水标准”，因此可以“安全”排入海洋。 然而，该计划在全球范围内也引起了很大争议。
现在，如果这瓶水实际上装的是经过“处理”的水，你会喝吗？ （停顿）我不会，这就是为什么我认为放射性水不应该被释放到海洋中，应该尽快停止。
BP1-“处理过的水”？
首先，我想向大家介绍一下放射性废物的影响。 [图片]它快速地从其中喷射出中子，所有这些都有可能断裂无数细胞中的无数DNA链，因为中子在刺穿一个细胞后不会停止。 受影响的细胞可能无法繁殖； 或者它们变得有缺陷，它复制的细胞也会有缺陷； 或者它们发展成癌症。 由于上述原因，放射性废物严重威胁着其附近的所有生物。
现在，让我们看看福岛储存的水。 那是直接接触裸露岩心的水，经过ALPS（先进液体处理系统）处理，但仍然含有一些放射性物质。 有趣的是，放射性废物是“一种含有放射性物质的危险废物”，与福岛的放射性水相匹配。 嗯……
为什么我必须澄清这一点？ 因为一个概念的名称会影响我们对它的理解。 您对“处理过的水”有何看法？ 在我看来，它接近于工业废水。 “放射性水”听起来一样吗？ 不，它们是放射性废物。 显然，人们不会像监管放射性废物那样严格监管工业废水，这就是为什么现在每天都有数百吨此类废物流入太平洋！
BP2-披着羊皮的狼
尽管日本政府声称其“处理过的”水是安全的，并且“国际原子能机构”或IAEA对“处理过的水样”的检查也支持这一点，但这些声明的权威性很弱，即使IAEA是联合国 相当于核领域。 让我们来揭开那些有“科学”“支持”的说法。 ALPS是日本开发的过滤系统，仅在福岛使用，其效果尚未在全球得到验证； 国际原子能机构确实检查了水样，但这些样品是日本政府直接提供的。 他们甚至可以立即向国际原子能机构提供我手中的一瓶水（肢体语言），并告诉他们，“嘿，这是来自福岛的水样”，如果东京愿意的话。 因此，就连IAEA的声明中也提到不会承担任何责任。 现在，日本当局根据这些科学废话说，“我们的释放是有科学依据的”，这……是有偏见的。
BP3-不是“他们”而是“我们”
当放射性物质扩散到整个太平洋时，人类将会发生什么？ 一份学术出版物声称全球社会福利总成本可能超过2000亿美元，但说实话，我们不知道。 由于日本承认放射性水为“处理过的水”，因此几乎没有进行任何研究； 我们最好不要冒险。
虽然日本释放的放射性水可能不会直接造成死亡，但日本的做法非常不负责任。 日本把全世界都下了赌注，赌核废料排入海洋的副作用可以忽略不计。 然而，如果日本输了，那么每个人都会平等地面临后果。
也许十年后，我们就能在墨尔本的家中享受放射性阵雨。 到那时，能做的事情已经不多了。
反射
著名物理学家阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦曾说过：“世界不会被那些作恶的人毁灭，而是被那些袖手旁观的人毁灭。” 事实上，如果“处理过的水”确实符合“饮用水标准”，那么就没有充分的理由将水排入海洋； 如果它不能饮用，那么它就不像日本所宣传的那么安全，也不应该被释放。 由于日本是一个缺乏淡水的国家，我甚至在这里对“处理过的水”有一个解决方案：将处理过的水淡化，将其装入这个瓶子（道具）中，然后将其作为饮用水出售。
然而问题又回来了——
你会喝吗？
要不是没文更新了鬼会放这个啊！甚至还没完善好啊！！！没办法，今天光是对着演讲稿做PPT就花掉了七个小时，最近根本就没时间写……TAT
