Introduction of Psychology - 01
Reflective深思熟虑的 thinking can help you better understand and
remember details about an experience in the future.
★★★SQ4R :
1.Survey 2.Question 3.Read & Recite叙述 & Reflect反馈 & Review
==Chapter1: Introduction to Psychology and Research Methods
Many people regard themselves as expert “people watchers” and form
their own commonsense theories of behavior.
-
However, you may be surprised to learn how
often self-appointed authorities and long-held commonsense
beliefs about human behavior are wrong.
Critical thinking relies on the following basic principles :
1.Few “truths” transcend the need for logical analysis and empirical testing.
-
2.Critical thinkers often wonder what it would take to show that a
“truth” is false.
--★Admitting you are wrong is always hard—even though it’s a skill that
every psychologist has to learn.”
-
3.Authority or claimed expertise专门知识或技能 does not automatically
make an idea true or false.
-
4.Judging the quality of evidence is crucial★重要的.
-
5.Critical thinking requires an open mind.
--
Carl Sagan once noted, “It seems to me that what is called for is an
exquisite精密的 balance between two conflicting needs: the most skeptical怀疑的
scrutiny审查 of all hypotheses that are served up to us and at the same
time a great openness to new ideas” .
=
To put these principles into action, here are some questions to ask
as you evaluate new information:
1. What claims断言 are being made? What are their implications含义/暗示?
2. Are the claims understandable? Do they make logical sense?
Is there another possible explanation? Is it a simpler
explanation?
3. What tests (if any) of these claims have been made? What
was the nature and quality of the tests? Can they be repeated?
Who did the tests? How reliable and trustworthy were the
investigators? Do they have conflicts of interest? Do their
findings appear to be objective? Has any other independent
researcher duplicated the findings?
4. How good is the evidence? (In general, scientific observations
provide the highest quality evidence.)
5. Finally, how much credibility can the claim be given? High,
medium, low, provisional暂时的?