《消失的TA》影评regarding Alienation Effect
《The Disappeared TA》was not an instant hit with audiences after it was released on , why the glossing box office sensation earns that cognitive effect of snap audience awake after it was released on? in this lecture, we'll learn the special recipe for making people think. so that you can earn the similar awaken cognitive effect instead of emotional escapism. because intensify emotions form the core of our brains, the deepest and strongest drivers of our identity and behave, so that's why we're so easily conned into irrational self-destruction, allowing more romantic satisfaction to get us all drunk on empty video entertainment, while the real world burns outside. spoliler alarm: if you haven't seen the film, hit the pause and go ahead to enjoy. 是的是的，曾几何时，我们求签问卦的，就是影视故事的霸道总裁从天而降，免去自己的一切奋斗，给自己负担所有的费用，甚至支持自己所有梦想成真，曾几何时，骨感的现实一次次给了警钟。我们不可能再沉迷浪漫满足的世界逃避现实，于是乎《消失的TA》协助我们批判性的思考这种现实背后的原因。是的，那些深沉的情感，总是驱动人设的打造，引以为豪，驱动人误会对错的行为，一念之间。不管你结果后果后悔与否，都成为人生的试错成本。《消失的TA》并没有替代你思考，给情感的避港湾。而是启发观众不断的深度思考，给情感问题深度念转治愈。一起来分析这种认知效果改写如何通过情节展开的吧？！剧透警告，如果没有看过完整影片的，建议暂停去体验。
<the disappeared TA> wants to alienate us to make us feel the cracks and differences, between ourselves and the characters. to do this, the script invests each character with a mix of motivess. some of these motives are rooted in deep and powerful fears, that encourage empathy in the audience, but other motivess seem happenstance and trivial, which generates an ironic implication of deeper secrets, promoting the audience to look for the hidden reasons, for the character's behavior, and to question, whether the original empathy was deserved.
how doest the technique work? with one challenging character, calls for his lost wife, but there's no evidence proof his wife side by him is false. HeFei seems to be motivated by a desire to fight injustice. 影视开篇主角何非 假老婆 警官出现的，何非生生控诉假老婆如何假，情绪是角色与观众建立同理心的关键，但是，何非手机里的证据 录像里的证据 恋爱细节的证据，都透露了秘密，让观众感觉自己的同理心真的值得吗？！
when Pliceman complains that HeFei is just and i'll trouble maker. and he resist over the seeking for the lost wife case. then HeFei gets into an entirely theatrical display of outrage. 当书店买书证据再次对何非供词不利，郑警官拒绝接受假妻立案，这时候的何非怒火中烧。
the script makes the audience wonder, whether HeFei has any deep purpose in mind at all. he might be a paranoid otherwise why he constantly rely on those drugs. 此时的观众不由得问何非是不是真的有妄想症，还是另有所图。
so the juxtaposition of false wife significant motives, and her trivial ones makes the audience question. nothing in the script ever provides a clear answer. the script forces us to interrogate false wife motives in the same way, by betraying false wife as a nuisance than as a hustler, then as a wife, than as an opportunist, then as a social conscience. 同样的观众对假妻子对行为也是充满困惑，剧本并没有清楚的提供答案是别有用心，还是可怜的弃妇，观众不知道该怒斥假妻子是个机会主义利用富商，还是充满责任感对糊涂的丈夫不离不弃。
it makes us question. what's he fighting for? what is he most deeply believe? does he know himself. unlike traditional scripts, which carefully make us sympathize with their characters. this script keep scrambling our feelings and pushing us away. it even scrambles our feeling for the stories main antagonist. 让我们不由得产生疑问，何非为何这样费力的探索真妻子去哪了，知道自己是谁吗？行为不假思索了吗？与传统剧本让观众和角色建立同理心不同，该剧本不断的推开观众与角色的同理心，甚至对于反派角色也是用同意的疏离感。
the main antagonist, as we've known, the antagonist is usually a physical embodiment of the story worlds core rules. and when we first meet Layer, that's whe she is, the human face of propaganda cool. after HeFei raps"the friend of mine lost his wife, one false wife out of blue prevent him suiting for law". Layer coolly temps down this hot emotion by saying :"this is nomal business, is there somehting wrong with that, by depicting one similar story without accuracy answers". with that entirely rhetorical question, Lawyer restores the surface of the propaganda world. it's all chill and normal here. but the layer's final line in the scene is heated cry from the hearts. "i made lots of mistakes, for seeking the truth, the husband killed the real wife, who desperated to loving him, desperated to dying without despire". 反派就是某个司空见惯的不公平的故事世界的化身。律师出现的时候，面对何非“我的朋友的妻子消失了，一个从天而降的假妻子阻止立案调查”。律师平静的讲了一个类似的妻子消失的不了了之的案例。这世态是这样的。但是影片结尾，律师掩饰不住内心呐喊，哭道“你后悔吗？你亲手杀了爱你的妻子和孩子，一个妻子为爱你迫不及待的一步步妥协到没原则，一个妻子为减少绝望煎熬迫不及待的加速死去”。
HeFei response inocent, "is there anything wrong with me, why can't i born with better situation. why can't wife help me out again and again, how could she witness my suffering from paying debts without helping hand. " which makes us start to question. is anybody happy there. is HeFei a victim of the propaganda world? or is he simply reaping what he sown? 影片何非面对昭然若揭的真相大喊道“我生来经济不宽裕，生来为经济奔波，也是我的错吗？看到我为贷款苦苦挣扎，她作为妻子帮我有错吗？花她父母的钱有错吗？”也是和故事世界强烈的冲突。观众不由抽身思考，究竟何非是故事世界的受害者，还是自食恶果？！
the tone works throughout the script always split into two part, one half of the time is a matter-of-facts realism, the other half of the time it's a self-conscious perfoemace. each of these tones disrupts the other, making the audience wonder, which one is true. you can create a narrator that sees with two different God's-eyes. one that sees the truth, and the other that sees a different conflicting truth. then speak both truth. that tone generate brilliant scenes from shocking moments to the moment where the characters break the forth wall to sharing the propaganda chill, is a violent collision of unresolved emotions. 通篇的基调一分为二，自相矛段，其一真相是事实寻求正义，另一半真相是人性寻求因果。如同叙事者创建两个真相，一个真相大白的事实，另一个未解决的情感冲突，最后给观众的思考，哪一个是对的，“到底无止境的协助无止境的宽容是对的，还是被给予帮助的理所当然是对的，这不就是这个世界习以为常的司空见惯的论调吗？！思维表面上何错之有啊，思维导演的行为上却大错特错啊”。
well, we feel unsettled and our emotional discomfort is heightened by the way that the scene, but we feel powerless to speak up or intervene. yes, it's undertandable mistake, but unblievable tragedy. 是啊，当真相昭然若揭的时候，观众感情不舒服不安的，但是人的思维听起来，却找不出义正严辞的批判的理由。可以理解的错误思维司空见惯的，但是难以接受的悲剧。
the positive change requires us instead to shake off sentiment and reason critically, untill the audience gets restless, shakes off the illusion of performance, and begins to actively question. that's the epiphany the audience got, where the script finally point the audience to the right direction in a more useful way. 影视通过疏离观众对任何一个角色的情感共鸣，去积极的提问，得到的念转，这种悲剧的根源，就是我们司空见惯的思维。对的，被帮助的人不应该认为理所当然。有能力帮助的人不能没有原则和底线，毕竟经济可以救济，精神贫瘠可是经济可以救济的吗？！
