关于8.4 Arcaea大量玩家误封来自Guy的回复

616官方尚未对此事件进行回复，但Guy已经明确地给出回应。根据他的回应，我认为解封误封的账号可以说是不可能了。以下为Guy原文。 Some further information regarding recently carried out bans in Arcaea. 1. We confirmed evidence of cheating tools being used in every ban that was carried out. No bans were carried out using heuristics or ‘obtaining scores too quickly’ alone whatsoever. 2. We cannot reveal the evidence of cheating tools used as this would likely cause further cheating. 3. Multiple staff (more than 4) in charge of key areas of Arcaea agreed upon the actions taken in this ban wave. 4. There was a large spike in both increased skill of players, back to back FPM achievements within minutes, and cheating tool evidence which occurred on the 26th and 27th July. 5. Many accounts that have had a large play history and notable achievements were found to have evidence of cheat tool use. We took action regardless of severity of the tool use – as these tools allow for custom scores outside of FPM achievement. 6. Many (30+) users who have contacted lowiro support have had their accounts manual reviewed and the bans upheld. We have not yet found a single case of a mistaken ban after manual review. Targeted harassment does not achieve change but simply makes the lives of those involved miserable and reduces the ability for projects to continue. Think twice whether you are standing up for a just cause or merely amplifying the voices of cheaters. If you choose to doubt lowiro’s ability to determine cheaters, you should equally doubt the honesty of those making claims about this. 关于最近在Arcaea实施禁令的一些进一步信息。 1.我们确认了在执行的每一项禁令中都使用作弊工具的证据。没有使用启发式或“获取分数太快”单独实施禁令。 2.我们不能透露使用作弊工具的证据，因为这可能会导致进一步的作弊。 3.负责Arceaa关键区域的多名工作人员（超过4人）同意在这场禁令风波中采取的行动。 4.7月26日和27日，玩家技能的提高、几分钟内的背靠背FPM成绩以及作弊工具证据都出现了大幅飙升。 5.许多有着大量游戏历史和显著成就的账户都被发现有使用作弊工具的证据。无论工具使用的严重程度如何，我们都采取了行动——因为这些工具允许FPM成绩之外的自定义分数。 6.许多（30多名）联系lowiro支持的用户已经对他们的账户进行了手动审查，但维持了禁令。经过人工审查，我们还没有发现一例错误的禁令。 你们怀有目的的骚扰并不能带来改变，只会使相关人员的生活受到负面影响，并影响此项目的进行。无论你是为了正义而站出来，还是仅仅为了放大骗子的声音，都要三思而后行。如果你选择怀疑lowiro确定作弊者的能力，你同样应该怀疑那些对此提出指控的人是否可信。 对此，我认为有一些问题他在回避/隐瞒。 1.616是否具备检测玩家成绩进步是否正常的机制？正常的推分貌似无法与异常的理论值成绩相分离。由此616是否采取任何可以避免误封的措施？ 2.616对30余名申诉的玩家进行人工审查，在审查结果中为何选择以“异常活动”作为封禁理由，并且仅回复封禁无法撤销？Guy在此处特意强调了“人工审查”，在封禁时是否基于人工审查？还是说，封禁时仅仅依靠所谓“不可公布的作弊证据”，交由机器审查？616是否对于此次封禁的可靠性进行考证？ 3.当提出对616指控的人提供了相关证据（比如我，在对lowiro的申诉中发送了我这一端的数据，包括推分记录、各次成绩截图、账户购买记录、游戏后台数据），为何616仍旧以相同言论对待？616仅提出了“是否可信”的问题，为何没有延伸，将“如果可信”算作考虑范围？ 由此我认为Guy根本没有考虑解封257个账号里哪怕一个。他以偏主观的判断来论证自己封禁的合理性，但没有也从未基于玩家角度考虑。一个游戏账号对于他来说什么也不是。 所以，这就没了。All is done。