关于核污水数据包后续的后续

我抽空回复了第三和第四条评论，因为我不想让他们以为我是错的。以下为原文和百度翻译译文。 I just wrote a long reply to another comment, since he was more rational than you, I think the reply is suitable for you as well. Here is the original reply. ———— It’s a pity that the data pack has been deleted by PMC, but still, I should reply to your comment. Thank you for your long and rational comment, it makes sense for our conversation.  Before we start talking about whether Japanese’ dumped water is safe or not, we should discuss whether they really HAVE to do that. As far as I know, there are plenty of schemes offered to the Japanese government by experts in Japan and experts from other countries, but the government chose “the most economical way”. Here’s the question that Japan never answered:“If the water is safe, why dump it into the ocean?” Why not use it in agricultural and industrial production? That’s really a simple question. Second, I have watched and read the materials you provided (some of which briefly). I’m not a scientist, so I don’t think I’m qualified to judge or question those statements, I believe the problem is, in different areas, people from different political stands tell differently. How, should people actually living beside the polluted sea believe the explanation from some experts on the other side of the Earth, when they know the countries the experts come from are no friends of theirs, or that governments choose economic benefits rather than them? Experts and media in their own countries speak entirely differently with rigorous scientific evidence as well, while they speak for their people. Under such circumstances, I believe you would understand that people won‘t buy the Japanese government’s propaganda.  Speaking about the propaganda, I have to claim the purpose of this data pack I made. I believe you are one of the minority knowing this news if you are living in the West. Those media are keeping silent about this, and I think you know why. So, I was just trying my best to let more people know about what’s happening, only in that way will the truth have bigger chance to be revealed, whether it’s good or bad. So you should know that it’s not about “which damages the marine ecosystem the most, the nuclear sewage, the plastic, or the oil industry?” ALL OF THEM should be known. I have to say that the indifference on PMC really disappoints me, and I hope that when you land and your water are in danger or potential danger, you can keep your rational mind, thank you. And wish you health. 百度译文： 我刚刚给另一条评论写了一个很长的回复，因为他比你更理性，我认为这个回复也适合你。 这是最初的答复。 -------- 很遗憾，PMC已经删除了数据包，但我仍然应该回复你的评论。谢谢你的长篇大论，这对我们的谈话很有意义。 在我们开始讨论日本人倾倒的水是否安全之前，我们应该讨论他们是否真的必须这样做。据我所知，日本的专家和其他国家的专家向日本政府提供了很多方案，但政府选择了“最经济的方式”。这是一个日本从未回答过的问题：“如果水是安全的，为什么要把它倾倒到海里？”为什么不把它用于农业和工业生产？这真是一个简单的问题。 其次，我看了你提供的材料（其中一些材料很简短）。我不是科学家，所以我认为我没有资格评判或质疑这些说法，我认为问题是，在不同的领域，来自不同政治立场的人的说法不同。当人们知道专家们来自的国家不是他们的朋友，或者政府选择经济利益而不是他们的时候，他们应该如何相信地球另一端一些专家的解释？本国的专家和媒体在为本国人民说话的同时，也用严格的科学证据发表了完全不同的看法。在这种情况下，我相信你会明白，人们不会相信日本政府的宣传。 说到宣传，我不得不声明我制作的这个数据包的目的。如果你生活在西方，我相信你是少数知道这个消息的人之一。那些媒体对此保持沉默，我想你知道为什么。所以，我只是尽力让更多的人知道正在发生的事情，只有这样，真相才会有更大的机会被揭露，无论是好是坏。所以你应该知道，这不是关于“核污水、塑料和石油工业哪个对海洋生态系统的破坏最大？”所有这些都应该知道。 我不得不说，PMC的冷漠真的让我失望，我希望当你身边的土地和水域处于危险或潜在危险中时，你能保持“理性”，谢谢。祝你身体健康。