苏联级战列舰减配青春版
考虑到苏联级的昂贵造价和大量新技术运用使得苏联不可能在战前完成建造，如果使用战前苏联掌握的技术和成熟设备，以及更低的成本能够建造一种怎样的战列舰呢？
以1936年A型战列舰技术指标为参考，采用战前已经服役或者试制的设备，使用条约战列舰的思路大幅压缩排水量。
动力装置采用两套7型驱逐舰的动力组（增强型可采用26型巡洋舰动力）。主炮采用奥布霍夫斯基1914型406毫米L45改进型。副炮为B2LM双130（塔什干和火力级主炮），高炮为76毫米双联装39K和双37毫米V11。主装为280+50毫米，双层剥被帽体系（外层50毫米高硬度装甲板5度倾斜布置，内层280毫米表面硬化装甲10度倾斜布置，中间间隔400-650毫米空间，外板和主装之间的支撑结构可以兼做承力）。TDS宽度4.5米，多层纵向隔板。
SPS分析
1936 TAPY A, USSR BATTLESHIP laid down 1936
Displacement:
35,455 t light; 37,693 t standard; 39,693 t normal; 41,292 t full load
Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(751.20 ft / 738.19 ft) x 98.43 ft (Bulges 101.71 ft) x (30.84 / 31.89 ft)
(228.97 m / 225.00 m) x 30.00 m (Bulges 31.00 m) x (9.40 / 9.72 m)
Armament:
9 - 15.98" / 406 mm 45.0 cal guns - 2,248.72lbs / 1,020.00kg shells, 120 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1936 Model
3 x 3-gun mounts on centreline, evenly spread
1 raised mount
Aft Main mounts separated by engine room
14 - 5.12" / 130 mm 50.0 cal guns - 70.97lbs / 32.19kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1936 Model
6 x 2-gun mounts on sides, evenly spread
2 raised mounts
1 x 2-gun mount on centreline, aft deck aft
1 raised mount
8 - 2.99" / 76.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 13.51lbs / 6.13kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1936 Model
4 x 2-gun mounts on sides, evenly spread
4 raised mounts
20 - 1.46" / 37.0 mm 60.0 cal guns - 1.69lbs / 0.77kg shells, 150 per gun
Breech loading guns in deck mounts, 1936 Model
10 x 2-gun mounts on centreline, evenly spread
6 raised mounts
Weight of broadside 21,374 lbs / 9,695 kg
Armour:
- Belts:Width (max)Length (avg)Height (avg)
Main:13.0" / 330 mm479.00 ft / 146.00 m16.40 ft / 5.00 m
Ends:Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 100% of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.18" / 30 mm479.00 ft / 146.00 m26.25 ft / 8.00 m
- Gun armour:Face (max)Other gunhouse (avg)Barbette/hoist (max)
Main:15.7" / 400 mm5.91" / 150 mm15.4" / 390 mm
2nd:3.94" / 100 mm1.97" / 50 mm4.72" / 120 mm
- Armoured deck - multiple decks: 5.91" / 150 mm For and Aft decks
- Conning towers: Forward 14.96" / 380 mm, Aft 0.00" / 0 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 116,054 shp / 86,577 Kw = 28.00 kts
Range 8,000nm at 14.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,600 tons
Complement:
1,405 - 1,827
Cost:
£18.653 million / $74.614 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 4,013 tons, 10.1%
Armour: 13,485 tons, 34.0%
- Belts: 4,363 tons, 11.0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 549 tons, 1.4%
- Armament: 3,436 tons, 8.7%
- Armour Deck: 4,761 tons, 12.0%
- Conning Tower: 375 tons, 0.9%
Machinery: 3,256 tons, 8.2%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 14,700 tons, 37.0%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,237 tons, 10.7%
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0%
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
51,423 lbs / 23,325 Kg = 25.2 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 7.5 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.11
Metacentric height 5.9 ft / 1.8 m
Roll period: 17.6 seconds
Steadiness- As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 52 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.75
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.04
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck,
a straight bulbous bow and a round stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.600 / 0.604
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.26 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.17 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 15.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 4.92 ft / 1.50 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle:20.00%, 30.18 ft / 9.20 m, 21.33 ft / 6.50 m
- Forward deck:30.00%, 21.33 ft / 6.50 m, 18.04 ft / 5.50 m
- Aft deck:35.00%, 18.04 ft / 5.50 m, 18.04 ft / 5.50 m
- Quarter deck:15.00%, 18.04 ft / 5.50 m, 19.69 ft / 6.00 m
- Average freeboard:20.02 ft / 6.10 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space- Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 87.6%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 135.5%
Waterplane Area: 53,140 Square feet or 4,937 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 106%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 222 lbs/sq ft or 1,086 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.00
- Longitudinal: 1.30
- Overall: 1.02
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
第一次gao船体3D建模，做得比较简陋
虽然减配，但对付蛐蛐还是绰绰有余的。
有人认为增加装甲倾斜角度可以不付出结构重量的代价，甚至大厚度主装采用20度以上倾斜布置具备普遍可操作性。装甲是安装在船体结构上的，垂直安装的装甲只给船体结构带来垂直方向的荷载，船体结构无论是肋骨还是舷侧的纵向承力结构都适合承受垂直方向的荷载。而如果装甲外倾布置，舷侧结构就不仅承受垂直方向荷载，还承受倾斜装甲通过螺栓传递给结构向外牵拉的应力，舷侧结构势必要进行加强，特别是大厚度装甲造成的外拉应力更大，需要进行的结构补强也就更多（装甲薄的巡洋舰采用较大装甲倾角付出的结构代价要小得多）。
如果考虑倾斜装甲所要付出的安装结构重量，那么未必有直接加厚装甲来得实在。况且由于存在炮弹转正效应，小于60度弹着角倾斜装甲并不能等效法线厚度的垂直装甲（实际上并不能节省重量）。
总之考虑船体结构、装甲厚度、倾斜装甲并非万金油，随着距离增加，炮弹入射角变大，倾斜装甲的优势才会明显。
有人认为苏联级50毫米水平装甲应该挪到155毫米水平装甲上面，以为这样可以形成剥被帽体系，但是剥被帽靠的是炮弹本身的动能，大角度抛射下落的炮弹存速并不高，撞击50毫米装甲的结果大概率仅仅是让炮弹减速，而不能有效剥离被帽。相反，在155装甲下安装50毫米装甲可以在万一155装甲发生崩落的情况下作为装甲内衬（假如采用类似意大利的高硬度水平装甲，发生这种情况的概率就很大）。
